The practice of value - reply

In Jay Wallace (ed.), The Practice of Value. Oxford University Press (2003)
Authors
Joseph Raz
Columbia University
Abstract
The privilege of having three sets of extensive and hard-hitting comments on one's work is as welcome as it is rare, and especially so on this occasion as the lectures were, for me, but thefirst (well, not entirely first) stab at a subject I hope to explore at greater length. The reflectionsthat follow will respond to some of the criticisms, but will not be a point by point reply. I will use the occasion to clarify some obscurities in the lectures, and to contrast my view with some of my critics' own positions. I will proceed thematically, starting with some observations about method and about ontology, proceeding to explore several questions about the relations between social dependence and relativism, between genre, value, and normativity, and concluding with a fewwords on pluralism and liberal values.
Keywords value  social practice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,013
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceptualising Meaningful Work as a Fundamental Human Need.Ruth Yeoman - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-17.
Moral Antirealism, Internalism, and Sport.William J. Morgan - 2004 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (2):161-183.
Wellbeing and Education: Issues of Culture and Authority.John White - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (1):17–28.
Pottering in the Garden? On Human Flourishing and Education.Doret J. De Ruyter - 2004 - British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (4):377-389.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Critics.Theodore M. Drange - 2005 - Philo 8 (2):169-182.
Physical and Mental? Reply to John Searle.Anthonie W. M. Meijers - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.
Virtual Invaders.Robrecht Vanderbeeken - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (1):159-164.
Reconsidering Bohr's Reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.
Consensus and Excellence of Reasons.Jeremy Randel Koons - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:83-103.
How Not to Structure a Social Theory: A Reply to a Critical Response.Anthony King - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):464-479.
Reply to Comments.Jon Elster - 1986 - Theory and Society 29 (1-4):65 – 77.
The Practice of Value.Joseph Raz (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
55 ( #123,689 of 2,312,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #95,714 of 2,312,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature