Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances

Cambridge University Press (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Recanati's book is a major new contribution to the philosophy of language. Its point of departure is a refutation of two views central to the work of speech-act theorists such as Austin & Searle: that speech acts are essentially conventional, & that the force of an utterance can be made fully explicit at the level of sentence-meaning & is in principle a matter of linguistic decoding. The author argues that no utterance can be fully understood simply in terms of its linguistic meaning, but that only a contextual inference can provide an adequate framework. In pursuit of this argument, he deals with the major issues of pragmatics & speech-act theory: conversational implicatives & indirect speech acts, the classification of illocutionary forces, the performative/constative distinction, delocutivity, locutionary meaning, non-literal uses of languages, the principle of expressibilty, & the difference between institutional & communicative illocutionary acts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,737

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
199 (#67,082)

6 months
10 (#98,925)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hedged Assertion.Matthew A. Benton & Peter Van Elswyk - 2020 - In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-263.
Truth and assertion: rules vs aims.Neri Marsili - 2018 - Analysis 78 (4):638–648.
Rules of Use.Indrek Reiland - forthcoming - Mind and Language.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references