Tuberculosis, non-compliance and detention for the public health

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):157-159 (2000)
Coercion, the act of compelling someone to do something by the use of power, intimidation, or threats, has been deemed a necessary weapon in the public health armamentarium since before public health fell under the remit of physicians and out of the grip of “sanitarians” and civil engineers. This article examines the ethics of detention in the pursuit of public health and uses a contemporary example, detention of poorly compliant individuals with tuberculosis, to highlight the moral dilemmas posed, and examine whether recently proposed approaches are just. In particular I focus upon the public health response to non-infectious individuals who fail to comply with treatment . Our response to them helps clarify contemporary attitudes to recalcitrant, often marginalised, individuals who pose an uncertain threat.Globally tuberculosis control is failing. The World Health Organisation recently called this public health threat a global emergency.1 Transmission occurs through often casual contact from individuals who have pulmonary disease. Although there is much that is uncertain regarding the infectiousness of this ancient disease, we do know that those who are smear-positive, that is who have organisms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis visible in stained respiratory secretions, are considerably more infectious than those who do not.2, 3 Compliance with effective treatment rapidly makes previously infectious patients non-infectious. Standard treatment for fully drug-sensitive tuberculosis usually lasts for six months. Erratic adherence to chemotherapy, however, may result in relapse and the development of drug-resistant disease which is considerably more difficult to treat.In the 1980s and early 1990s New York City witnessed an epidemic of tuberculosis and, of particular concern, a marked increase in drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains. In the early 1990s the threat of a virtually untreatable, casually communicable, …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.26.3.157
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
J. S. Mill and the American Law of Quarantine.Wendy E. Parmet - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):210-222.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Yann Joly & Gillian Nycum - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (4):734-738.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Yann Joly & Gillian Nycum - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):734-738.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ethics, Tuberculosis and Globalization.Michael J. Selgelid - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):10-20.
Public Health and Public Goods.Jonny Anomaly - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
New York City, Tuberculosis, and the Public Health Infrastructure.Stephen C. Joseph - 1993 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 21 (3-4):372-375.
Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law.A. M. Viens - 2011 - In Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Is Obesity a Public Health Problem?Jonny Anomaly - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (3):216-221.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
11 ( #438,568 of 2,210,139 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #385,055 of 2,210,139 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature