Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):91-108 (2005)
Fregean predicates applied to Fregean objects are merely defined by a "timeless" deductive order of sentences. They cannot provide sufficient structure in order to explain how names can refer to objects of intuition and how predicates can express properties of substances that change in time. Therefore, the accounts of Wilson and Quine, Prior and Brandom for temporal judgments fail -- and a new reconstruction of Kant's transcendental logic, especially of the analogies of experience, is needed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology.Avery Goldman - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: An Essay on the Philosophical Resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2010 - Kantian Review 14 (2):1-37.
Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
How Does Kant Prove That We Perceive, and Not Merely Imagine, Physical Objects?Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (4):781 - 806.
Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction.Dieter Henrich - 1982 - In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Review of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 640 - 659.
Added to index2009-05-25
Total downloads171 ( #24,721 of 2,040,661 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #204,552 of 2,040,661 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.