Analysis 49 (1):31 - 32 (1989)
The purpose of this article is to compare the theory that there are degrees of truth with putnam's intuitionist theory as rival solutions to the sorites paradox. I argue that intuitionist logic lacks explanatory support and is self-Defeating. The degree theory on the other hand offers an illuminating explanation of the sorites fallacy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Structures Inside Truth-Table Degrees.Frank Stephan - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):731-770.
Belief and Degrees of Belief.Franz Huber - 2009 - In F. Huber & C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of Belief. Springer.
Conceptions of Truth in Intuitionism.Panu Raatikainen - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2):131--45.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads61 ( #85,864 of 2,168,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?