Oxford University Press (2002)
Philosophical naturalism, according to which philosophy is continuous with the natural sciences, has dominated the Western academy for well over a century, but Michael Rea claims that it is without rational foundation. Rea argues compellingly to the surprising conclusion that naturalists are committed to rejecting realism about material objects, materialism, and perhaps realism about other minds.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$29.95 used (74% off) $46.75 new (15% off) $115.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B828.2.R43 2002|
|ISBN(s)||0199247609 0199247617 9780199247608 9780199247615|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Debunking Rationalist Defenses of Common-Sense Ontology: An Empirical Approach.Robert Carry Osborne - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):197-221.
Abduction and Modality.Stephen Biggs - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):283-326.
Similar books and articles
World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism.Evan Fales - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):494-497.
Naturalism and Ontology: A Reply to Dale Jacquette.Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357.
Definining Ontological Naturalism.Marcin Miłkowski - 2008 - In Alexander Hieke & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
Review of Michael Rea's, 'World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism'. [REVIEW]Andrew Melnyk - 2004 - Mind 113 (451):575-581.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #63,263 of 2,172,789 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,033 of 2,172,789 )
How can I increase my downloads?