- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Jus Post Bellum and Counterinsurgency
Journal of Military Ethics 7 (3):215-230 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Jus post bellum: Foundational principles and a proposed model.George M. Clifford - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):42-57.
The moral dimension of asymmetrical warfare: counter-terrorism, democratic values and military ethics.Ted van Baarda & Désirée Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
A Realistic and Effective Constraint on the Resort to Force? Pre-commitment to Jus in Bello and Jus Post Bellum as Part of the Criterion of Right Intention.Annalisa Koeman - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (3):198-220.
Care ethics and dependence— rethinking jus post bellum.Sigal Ben-Porath - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 61-71.
Post war environmental damage : a study in jus post bellum.Douglas Lackey - 2010 - In Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
The state, human rights and the ethics of war termination: what should a just peace look like? A critical appraisal.Manuela Melandri - 2011 - Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249.
Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy.Eric Patterson - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.
After war ends: a philosophical perspective.Larry May - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skepticism about Jus Post Bellum.Seth Lazar - 2012 - In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-222.
The Incoherence of Walzer’s Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
45 (#337,378)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
2010-08-24
Downloads
45 (#337,378)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ending the War Right: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War Tradition.Doug McCready - 2009 - Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):66-78.
Jus post bellum: Foundational principles and a proposed model.George M. Clifford - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):42-57.
Terminar correctamente la guerra: jus post bellum y la tradición de la guerra justa.Doug McCready, Angela Duarte & José Darío Álvarez - 2017 - Humanitas Hodie:64-85.
References found in this work
Nonlethal Weapons and Noncombatant Immunity: Is it Permissible to Target Noncombatants?Chris Mayer - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (3):221-231.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo