Stem Cell Research as Innovation: Expanding the Ethical and Policy Conversation
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):332-341 (2010)
Abstract
Research using human embryonic stem cells raises an array of complex ethical issues, including, but by no means limited to, the moral status of developing human life. Unfortunately much of the public discussion fails to take into account this complexity. Advocacy for liberal and conservative positions on human embryonic stem cell research can be simplistic and misleading. Ethical concepts such as truth-telling, scientific integrity, and social justice should be part of the debate over federal support for human embryonic stem cell research. Moreover, the debate should be conducted in accord with principles of deliberative democracy, including respect for people holding competing viewsDOI
10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00492.x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Developments in stem cell research and therapeutic cloning: Islamic ethical positions, a review.Hossam E. Fadel - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (3):128-135.
Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Human embryonic stem cell research: An intercultural perspective.LeRoy Walters - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):3-38.
Stemming the tide of normalisation: An expanded feminist analysis of the ethics and social impact of embryonic stem cell research.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
International society for stem cell research (ISSCR) guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research (december 2006).Bernard Dickens - unknown
Ethical issues in human embryonic stem cell research.Philip J. Nickel - 2008 - In Kristen Renwick Monroe, Ronald B. Miller & Jerome Tobis (eds.), Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical & Political Issues. University of California Press.
The ambiguity of the embryo: Ethical inconsistency in the human embryonic stem cell debate.Katrien Devolder & John Harris - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):153–169.
Stem cell research: An ethical evaluation of policy options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-11
Downloads
90 (#138,055)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
2010-08-11
Downloads
90 (#138,055)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.
References found in this work
Public Stem Cell Banks: Considerations of Justice in Stem Cell Research and Therapy.Ruth R. Faden, Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman-House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Xiao-Jiang Gao, Mark Greene, John A. Hansen, Patricia A. King, Stephen J. O'Brien, David H. Sachs, Kathryn E. Schill, Andrew Siegel, Davor Solter, Sonia M. Suter, Catherine M. Verfaillie, LeRoy B. Walters & John D. Gearhart - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (6):13-27.
Deliberative democracy and stem cell research in new York state: The good, the bad, and the ugly.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 63-78.
Single Payer meets managed competition: The case for public funding and private delivery.David DeGrazia - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):23-33.
Private-sector research ethics: Marketing or good conflicts management? The 2005 John J. Conley lecture on medical ethics. [REVIEW]Rebecca Dresser - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):115-139.