Literal Meaning
Cambridge University Press (2002)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
According to the dominant position among philosophers of language today, we can legitimately ascribe determinate contents to natural language sentences, independently of what the speaker actually means. This view contrasts with that held by ordinary language philosophers fifty years ago: according to them, speech acts, not sentences, are the primary bearers of content. François Recanati argues for the relevance of this controversy to the current debate about semantics and pragmatics. Is 'what is said' determined by linguistic conventions, or is it an aspect of 'speaker's meaning'? Do we need pragmatics to fix truth-conditions? What is 'literal meaning'? To what extent is semantic composition a creative process? How pervasive is context-sensitivity? Recanati provides an original and insightful defence of 'contextualism', and offers an informed survey of the spectrum of positions held by linguists and philosophers working at the semantics/pragmatics interface.
|
| Keywords | Semantics Semantics (Philosophy Pragmatics |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2002, 2003, 2004, 2010 |
| Call number | P325.R344 2004 |
| ISBN(s) | 9780511615382 9780521537360 9780511060984 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00088.x |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
Our Archive
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 48,784
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Thought Without Representation.John Perry & Simon Blackburn - 1986 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes( 60:137-166.
Citations of this work BETA
Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them).Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):170-185.
Semantics and the Objects of Assertion.Dilip Ninan - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):355-380.
View all 356 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
On the Distinction Between Literal and Non-Literal Language.David Ian Sturdee - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Semantics and Pragmatics.Christopher Gauker - 2012 - In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances.Frangois Recanati - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and Their Interface.Jay David Atlas - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Folk Psychology and Literal Meaning.Robert M. Harnish - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):383-400.
Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and Their Interface.Jay David Atlas - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
Linguistic Communication and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.Robyn Carston - 2008 - Synthese 165 (3):321-345.
Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati's Philosophy of Language.María José Frápolli (ed.) - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning.C. J. L. Talmage - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
137 ( #62,664 of 2,309,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #37,754 of 2,309,223 )
2009-01-28
Total views
137 ( #62,664 of 2,309,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #37,754 of 2,309,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
