Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):673 - 688 (1958)

Abstract
Ushenko presented his philosophy of logic in vehement opposition to "the postulationist theory." In the endeavor to amputate logic from philosophy and absorb it within mathematics, the postulationists viewed logic as an isolated object-logic to be discussed in meta-logic and construed its symbolic formulas as a game played according to arbitrarily established rules. The objections Ushenko raised are no longer novel, but twenty years ago the entire controversy was new. Above all, he stressed the numerous difficulties entangling the meta-logic. He scored the menace of an infinite regress of meta-logics, and insisted that the consequences of Gödel's work necessarily frustrate the initial great expectations of the postulationists. No purely formal system can be internally proved to be self-consistent and certainly no formal language can ever become as comprehensive as English, though the price of such comprehensiveness is the inevitable occurrence of contradictory sentences. Moreover, he argued that, despite the postulationists' pretense that rules like the principle of non-contradiction were mere conventions for playing the game of logic, these rules proved ubiquitous by trespassing from the object-logic and intruding into the ultimate reaches of the meta-logic.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1957, 1958
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph195811474
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: I.Andrew J. Reck - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):471 - 485.
Esthetic Immediacy.Andrew Ushenko - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):68-72.
Inquiry and Discourse.Andrew Ushenko - 1940 - Journal of Philosophy 37 (18):484-491.
The Problem of Semantics.Andrew Ushenko - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (8):197-205.
Power and Events.Andrew Paul Ushenko - 1946 - New York: Greenwood Press.
Comments on Russell's: An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth.Andrew Ushenko - 1941 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (1):98-101.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Andrew Ushenko - 1946 - Mind 55 (218):151-165.
A Response to Comments.Andrew P. Ushenko - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):483 - 485.
Theses on Power and Science.Andrew P. Ushenko - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):471 - 472.
Logical Form and Sensory Structure.Andrew Ushenko - 1941 - Philosophical Review 50 (6):615-622.
Hume's Theory of General Ideas.Andrew Ushenko - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):236 - 251.
The Philosophy of Relativity.Andrew Paul Ushenko - 1937 - London: G. Allen & Unwin.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
28 ( #371,338 of 2,411,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #539,061 of 2,411,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes