Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809 (2008)

Abstract
This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings confirm that the rate of retractions remains low but is increasing. The most commonly cited reason for retraction was research error or inability to reproduce results; the rate from research misconduct is an underestimate, since some retractions necessitated by research misconduct were reported as being due to inability to reproduce. Retraction by parties other than authors is increasing, especially for research misconduct. Although retractions are on average occurring sooner after publication than in the past, citation analysis shows that they are not being recognised by subsequent users of the work. Findings suggest that editors and institutional officials are taking more responsibility for correcting the scientific record but that reasons published in the retraction notice are not always reliable. More aggressive means of notification to the scientific community appear to be necessary
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2007.023069
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Retraction.[author unknown] - 2009 - Educational Studies 35 (2):237.
Retraction.[author unknown] - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):519-519.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Retraction Watch.Udo Schüklenk - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):ii-ii.
Retraction.Udo Schüklenk Willem Landman - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (2):118–118.
Retraction.Udo Schüklenk & Willem Landman - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (2):118-118.
Retraction Note for "Pdl has Interpolation".Tomasz Kowalski - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):935-935.
Objectivism Vs. Subjectivism in the Social Sciences.Paul Diesing - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):124-.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
8 ( #974,630 of 2,445,416 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #310,857 of 2,445,416 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes