The problem of relation between statistical mechanics (SM) and classical mechanics (CM), especially the question whether SM can be founded on CM, has been a subject of controversies since the rise of classical statistical mechanics (CSM) at the end of 19th century. The first views rejecting explicitly the possibility of laying the foundations of CSM in CM were triggered by the "Wiederkehr-" and "Umkehreinwand" arguments. These arguments played an important role in the debate about Boltzmann's original H-theorem and led to the so called statistical H-theorem proposed by Boltzmann himself. (For the history of these early debates we refer to Brush's monograph (Brush 1976).) After CSM had been brought to "canonical form" by the Ehrenfests, (Ehrenfest and Ehrenfest 1959) the physicists turned away from the foundational problem leaving it to mathematicians to worry about in the form of what has become called the ergodic theory. In retrospect, the physicists' general mood seems to have been the hope that ergodic theory establishes rigorously what is needed to found CSM on CM and which had been expressed essentially by Boltzmann already (Wightman 1985). However, very few physicists followed closely the developments in the mathematical theory of dynamic systems. One of those who did was the Russian physicist N.S. Krylov. (For a brief description of Krylov's personal life we refer to the papers in (Krylov 1979).).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Foundations of Statistical Mechanics—Two Approaches.Stephen Leeds - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.
Irreversibility and Statistical Mechanics: A New Approach?Robert W. Batterman - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):395-419.
Implications of Quantum Theory in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.David Wallace - manuscript
Why Ergodic Theory Does Not Explain the Success of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics.John Earman & Miklós Rédei - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):63-78.
Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem?Nicholas Maxwell - 1975 - Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
Prediction and Retrodiction in Boltzmann's Approach to Classical Statistical Mechanics.Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker - unknown
The Emergence and Interpretation of Probability in Bohmian Mechanics.Craig Callender - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):351-370.
Deterministic Probability: Neither Chance nor Credence.Aidan Lyon - 2010 - Synthese 182 (3):413-432.
Random Dynamics and the Research Programme of Classical Mechanics.Michal Tempczyk - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):227 – 239.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads49 ( #107,143 of 2,172,903 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,815 of 2,172,903 )
How can I increase my downloads?