The European Legacy 19 (2):174-186 (2014)

Authors
Paul Redding
University of Sydney
Abstract
In a short exchange published in 2000, Richard Rorty and Robert Brandom differed over the status of “facts” in a world containing no speakers and, hence, no speech acts. While Brandom wanted to retain the meaningfulness of talk of “facts” or “truths” about things—in this case truths about photons —in a world in which there could be no claimings about such things, Rorty denied the existence of any such “worldly items” as “facts.” In this essay the difference between Rorty and Brandom on this issue is used to explore their differing attitudes to modality. Brandom appeals to a Kantian approach of modal realism to support counterfactual claims. However, I argue that when his approach to modality is examined in the context of current debates over possible world semantics, his own “incompatibilist” semantics itself seems incompatible with a Kantian approach to modality. In turn, I suggest that this difference between Brandom and Rorty in their attitudes to modality reveals a difference in their respective attitudes to pragmatism’s relation to philosophy in general.
Keywords Rorty  Brandom  Modality  pragmatism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/10848770.2014.876199
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963):83-94.
Possible Worlds.Robert Stalnaker - 1976 - Noûs 10 (1):65-75.
Truth.P. F. Strawson - 1948 - Analysis 9 (6):83-97.
Truth.P. F. Strawson - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (3):215-215.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Hegelian Solution to a Tangle of Problems Facing Brandom'S Analytic Pragmatism.Paul Redding - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4):657-680.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rehabilitating Objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism.Steven Levine - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):567-589.
Reconstruction and Pragmatist Metaphysics. On Brandom’s Understanding of Rationality.Italo Testa - 2012 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):175-201.
Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland.John C. Malone - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):313 - 315.
Pragmatism and Inferentialism.John MacFarlane - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explici. Routledge. pp. 81--95.
Brandom on Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality.Gideon Rosen - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):611-23.
Vulgar Pragmatism.Susan Haack - 1995 - In Herman J. Saatkamp (ed.), Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Vanderbilt University Press. pp. 136.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-08

Total views
702 ( #6,173 of 2,330,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
89 ( #5,536 of 2,330,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes