Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: Moral responsibility and judicial-reasoning

Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187 (2010)
Abstract
Judicial obligation to enforce the law is typically regarded as both unproblematic and important: unproblematic because there is little reason to doubt that judges have a general, if prima facie, obligation to enforce law, and important because the obligation gives judges significant reason to limit their concern in adjudication to applying the law. I challenge both of these assumptions and argue that norms of political legitimacy, which may be extra-legal, are irretrievably at the basis of responsible judicial reasoning.
Keywords adjudication  legal reasoning  authority  judges
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-009-9061-2
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Law's Empire.R. DWORKIN - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Justification and Legitimacy.A. John Simmons - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):739-771.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-10-03

Total downloads
111 ( #45,924 of 2,191,304 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,455 of 2,191,304 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature