European Journal of Political Theory 18 (4): 489–507 (2016)

Authors
Merten Reglitz
University of Birmingham
Abstract
Immanuel Kant is recognized as one of the first philosophers who wrote systematically about global justice and world peace. In the current debate on global justice he is mostly appealed to by critics of extensive duties of global justice. However, I show in this paper that an analysis of Kant’s late work on rights and justice provides ample resources for disagreeing with those who take Kant to call for only modest changes in global politics. Kant’s comments in the Doctrine of Right clarify that he thinks we need a coercively enforced global civil condition. But his work also contains ideas that imply that within such a global legal order there must be no extreme forms of poverty and inequality, and that the current holdings of states are by no means conclusive possessions without confirmation by the global legal order we have a duty to establish. Thus, this paper challenges the prevailing interpretation of Kant as a conservative thinker about global justice that is held, for instance, by the leading contemporary liberal thinkers such as John Rawls, Thomas Nagel, and Ronald Dworkin.
Keywords Kant's Doctrine of Right  Global Distributive Justice  Cosmopolitanism  World Poverty  Global Property Scheme
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1177/1474885116662566
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
A New Philosophy for International Law.Ronald Dworkin - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (1):2-30.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Perpetual Peace and Cosmopolitical Method.Brian Milstein - 2017 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 50:107-131.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
Comentarios Sobre la Concepcion de la Justicia Global de Pogge.Pablo Gilabert - 2007 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (2):205-222.
Why Global Justice Matters.Kok-Chor Tan - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (2):128-134.
Duties to the Global Poor and Minimalism About Global Justice.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):65-89.
Recognition Theory and Global Poverty.Gottfried Schweiger - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (3):267-273.
Punishing States That Cause Global Poverty.Thom Brooks - 2007 - William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.
Contractualism and Poverty Relief.Pablo Gilabert - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (2):277-310.
Practical Nationalism and Global Duties of Justice.Maria V. Rodrigues - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):176-189.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-13

Total views
38 ( #261,410 of 2,386,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #554,109 of 2,386,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes