Die stellung der biologie in den neukantianischen systemen Von Ernst Cassirer und Nicolai Hartmann

Acta Biotheoretica 28 (3):217-233 (1979)
Abstract
The founders of the Marburger Schule of Neo-Kantianism, Hermann Cohen and Paul Natorp, laid an emphasis upon a Platonic understanding of mathematics and logic as the paradigmatic epistemological basis of philosophy. Their successors, namely Ernst Cassirer and Nicolai Hartmann, made obvious, however, that new biological thinking can have a strong influence on ontology as well as on the theory of knowledge. They could show that biology was no longer to be treated as a metaphysical system in that pejorative meaning of metaphysics which Kant had so severely been opposing. Against the anti-realistic approach of the older neo-Kantians who wanted to eliminate Kant's thing-in-itself (Ding an sich), both Cassirer and Hartmann returned to a form of realism by way of Hegel's philosophical results and reflections on his method. This makes clear that their realism is still to be taken as a more of less monistic idealism. However, considering that modern biology as an antimetaphysical force became influential in their system for the first time and that it did so in two different but - on second thoughts - complementary ways, it becomes clear that it was necessary to change the paradigms of any neo-Kantian philosophy. Cassirer proved this by his development as a philosopher with a strong historical impetus while Hartmann as a more systematical philosopher only pointed in that direction.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00046354
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff.Ernst Cassirer - 1910 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 18 (6):7-8.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics.Thomas Mormann - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):151 - 181.
Ernst Cassirer. Ausgewählter Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel (Review).Thora Ilin Bayer - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):403-404.
The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer.Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - New York: Tudor Pub. Co..
Ernst Cassirer's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry.Jeremy Heis - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):759 - 794.
Cassirer, Neo-Kantianism and Metaphysics.John Michael Krois - 1992 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 97 (4):437 - 453.
Nicolai Hartmann's Definition of Biological Species.Frederic Tremblay - 2011 - In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 125--139.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

22 ( #227,386 of 2,169,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #186,285 of 2,169,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums