„Ihr seid verloren, wenn ihr vergeßt, daß die Früchte allen gehören und die Erde niemandem“: Rousseaus Eigentumskonzeption,

In Bernd Ludwig & Andreas Eckl (eds.), Was ist mein? Beck. pp. 103-117 (2005)
Authors
Michaela Rehm
Universität Bielefeld
Abstract
The paper is an analysis of Rousseau’s concept of property. It shows that Rousseau wants to draft a new system of politics that will not forbid private property but will limit its scale. It aims to clarify that Rousseau owes much to John Locke’s theory and even adopts Locke’s definition that it is a basic purpose of the social contract to protect the citizen’s property. It is argued that in spite of these similarities Rousseau’s account differs fundamentally from Locke’s. Having a right of ownership to something for Locke means to be entitled to exclude anybody else from it: to say “this is mine” in Locke is synonymous to “it is not yours”. For Rousseau having a right of ownership to something implies a self-limitation by the proprietor: to say “this is mine” in Rousseau signifies “everything else is not mine”. While property rights in Locke have the purpose of legitimizing “pleonexia” and economic inequality, Rousseau tries to use them as restrictions to citizens’ desires and greed.
Keywords property  appropriation  inequality  money  political philosophy  social contract
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rousseau and the Paradoxes of Property.C. Pierson - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):409-424.
A Paradox of Sovereignty in Rousseau's Social Contract.Matthew Simpson - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):45-56.
The Role of Public Opinion in Rousseau's Conception of Property.E. Putterman - 1999 - History of Political Thought 20 (3):417-437.
Obligation in Rousseau: Making Natural Law History?Michaela Rehm - 2012 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 20:139-154.
Rousseau.Timothy O'Hagan - 1999 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-31

Total downloads
118 ( #50,354 of 2,266,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #8,024 of 2,266,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature