From, the Editors 493
Stanley Joel Reiser, Kenneth Craig Micetich, William L. Freeman, Paul M. Mcneill, Catherine A. Berglund, Ianw Webster, Susan Sherwin, Evan Derenzo, Martyn Evans & Sujit Choudhry
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):522-532 (1994)
Abstract
Throughout the world, research ethics committees are relied on to prevent unethical research and protect research subjects. Given that reliance, the composition of committees and the manner in which decisions are arrived at by committee members is of critical importance. There have been Instances in which an inadequate review process has resulted in serious harm to research subjects. Deficient committee review was identified as one of the factors In a study in New Zealand which resulted in the suffering and death of many women diagnosed with carcinoma in situ.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How Much Influence Do Various Members Have within Research Ethics Committees?Paul M. McNeill, Catherine A. Berglund & Ian W. Webster - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):522.
Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ; The Text with Commentaries and Study Guide. By Donald Bolen and Gregory Cameron (editors) Mary for Time and Eternity: Essays on Mary and Ecumenism. By William McLoughlin and Jill Pinnock (editors) Mary: The Complete Resource. By Sarah Jane Boss. [REVIEW]Paul Brazier - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (2):357–360.
Are Referees Sufficiently Informed About The Editor'S Practice?Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (1):1-11.
Ethical practice in the accounting publishing process: Contrasting opinions of authors and editors. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):15 - 31.
Deleuze in China: Editors' Introduction.Craig Lundy & Paul Patton - 2013 - Theory and Event 16 (3):301-301.
Digital alteration of photographs in consumer magazines.Shiela Reaves - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):175 – 181.
Newsroom ethics: How tough is enforcement?Richard Morin & Bruce Giles - 1986 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (1):7 – 16.
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.E. Wager, S. Fiack, C. Graf, A. Robinson & I. Rowlands - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):348-353.
Reflection of an IRB Chair.Kenneth Craig Micetich - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):506.
Authors' Moral Rights—And How Editors and Publishers Routinely Abridge Them.Joseph S. Fulda - 2012 - Journal of Information Ethics 21 (2):7-9.
"Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns," ed. Stanley Joel Reiser, Arthur J. Dyck, and William J. Curran. [REVIEW]Edward Vacek - 1978 - Modern Schoolman 56 (1):89-90.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-31
Downloads
14 (#733,245)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2014-03-31
Downloads
14 (#733,245)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Bioethics and International Human Rights.David C. Thomasma - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):295-306.
Guidelines for IRB Review of International Collaborative Medical Research: A Proposal.Mary Terrell White - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (1):87-94.
Guidelines for IRB Review of International Collaborative Medical Research: A Proposal.Mary Terrell White - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (1):87-94.
Modified informed consent in a viral seroprevalence study in the caribbean.Cheryl Cox & C. N. L. MacPherson - 1996 - Bioethics 10 (3):222-232.