Philosophia Christi 16 (2):319-338 (2014)
AbstractTreatments of God's goodness almost always appeal to the traditional Christian doctrine that God is necessarily good, but this introduces the question whether God's goodness properly can be understood as necessary. After considering an ontological conception of God's goodness, I propose that God's goodness is better understood as satisfying six criteria involving moral virtue, intellectual virtue, right actions, right motives, freedom of choice, and freedom of choice with respect to the rightness of the action. I defend the result -- that God's goodness must be understood contingently, not necessarily -- against recent critics of this view.
Similar books and articles
On Some Ways in Which A Thing Can Be Good.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):96-117.
Monadic Teleology Without Goodness and Without God.Julia Jorati - 2013 - The Leibniz Review 23:43-72.
The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal — a Further Comment.Kam-Hon Lee - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):55 - 57.
The Goodness of Searching: Good as What? Good for What? Good for Whom?Amelie Oksenberg Rorty - 2011 - In Ruth Weissbourd Grant (ed.), In Search of Goodness. University of Chicago Press.
The Goodness of Being.Jan Aertsen - 2011 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 78 (2):281-295.
The Concept of Divine Goodness and the Problem of Evil.G. Stanley Kane - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (1):49 - 71.
The Good Man and the Upright Citizen in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics.David Keyt - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):220-240.
Is the Right Prior to the Good?Julian Fink - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):143-149.
Goodness And Beauty In Plato.Nicholas Riegel - 2014 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 12:143-154.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads