How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0039-3681(96)00027-1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,666

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How postmodern was Neurath's idea of unity of science?A. G. - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3):439-451.
Review of George A. Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Science 40 (1):153-155.
Review of George Reisch: The Politics of Paradigms. [REVIEW]Adam Tamas Tuboly - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):605-608.
The Popper-Neurath debate and Neurath's attack on scientific method.Jordi Cat - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (2):219-250.
Neurath’s protocol statements revisited: sketch of a theory of scientific testimony.Thomas Uebel - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):4-13.
Ahstract. Logical empiricists introduced and elahorated four ideas related to unity of science: unity of language, unity of laws, unity of method, and less typical for the mainstream of the movement Neurath's sociologically oriented idea of the unity of science practice. This paper presents the development of these ideas within the logical empiricist movement, and then outlines an answer to the question: how.Witold Strawiriski - 1995 - In William Herfel et al (ed.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes. Rodopi. pp. 44--295.
George Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Francis Remedios - 2006 - Philosophy in Review 26 (3):223-225.
Review: George Reisch. How the cold war transformed philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2005. [REVIEW]John M. Capps - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):167-171.
Philosophy of Science as First Philosophy: The Liberal Polemics of Ernest Nagel.Eric Schliesser - 2021 - In Matthias Neuber & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Ernest Nagel: Philosophy of Science and the Fight for Clarity. Springer. pp. 233-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
51 (#389,337)

6 months
8 (#456,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Reisch
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.Paul Oppenheim & Hilary Putnam - 1958 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:3-36.
Testability and meaning.Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
Testability and meaning (part 1).Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):420-71.
Testability and Meaning—Continued.Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (1):1-40.
Foundations of the Social Sciences.Morton G. White - 1944 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references