Methodologies for comparing complex computational models of eye-movement control in reading: Just fitting the data is not enough

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):499-500 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the number of computational models of eye-movement control in reading increases, so too will their coverage and complexity. This will make their comparison and testing increasingly challenging. We argue here that there is a need to develop a methodology for constructing and evaluating such models, and outline aspects of a possible methodology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evaluating a Computational Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading.Reinhold Kliegl & Ralf Engbert - 2013 - In Ulrich Gähde, Stephan Hartmann & Jörn Henning Wolf (eds.), Models, Simulations, and the Reduction of Complexity. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 153-178.
The game of word skipping: Who are the competitors?Ralf Engbert & Reinhold Kliegl - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):481-482.
Is Covert attention really unnecessary?Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):695-696.
Eye-movement control in reading: Models and predictions.Eyal M. Reingold - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):500-501.
Eye movements in reading: Models and data.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#611,820)

6 months
7 (#624,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references