Memory 10 (5/6):365-379 (2002)
Abstract |
The present paradigm involved manipulating the congruency of the perceptual processing during the study and test phases of a recognition memory task. During each trial, a gaze-contingent window was used to limit the stimulus display to a region either inside or outside a 108 square centred on the participant’s point of gaze, constituting the Central and Peripheral viewing modes respectively. The window position changed in real time in concert with changes in gaze position. Four experiments documented better task performance when viewing modes at encoding and retrieval matched than when they mismatched (i.e., perceptual specificity effects). Viewing mode congruency effects were demonstrated with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli. The present research is motivated and discussed in terms of theoretical views proposed in the 1970s including the levels-of-processing framework and the proceduralist viewpoint. In addition, implications for current processing and multiple systems views of memory are outlined.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 24 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Expert Vs. Novice Differences in the Detection of Relevant Information During a Chess Game: Evidence From Eye Movements.Heather Sheridan & Eyal M. Reingold - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Recognition Memory Performance as a Function of Reported Subjective Awareness.Heather Sheridan & Eyal M. Reingold - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1363-1375.
Perceptually Specific and Perceptually Non-Specific Influences on Rereading Benefits for Spatially Transformed Text: Evidence From Eye Movements.Heather Sheridan & Eyal M. Reingold - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (4):1739-1747.
Can Changes in Eye Movement Scanning Alter the Age-Related Deficit in Recognition Memory?Jessica P. K. Chan, Daphne Kamino, Malcolm A. Binns & Jennifer D. Ryan - 2011 - Frontiers in Psychology 2.
Can People Strategically Control the Encoding and Retrieval of Some Morphologic and Typographic Details of Words?Jerwen Jou & Hector M. Cortes - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1280-1297.
View all 7 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Contribution of Long-Term Memory and the Role of Frontal-Lobe Systems in on-Line Processing.Jennifer D. Ryan & Neal J. Cohen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):756-756.
Peripheral and Parafoveal Cueing and Masking Effects on Saccadic Selectivity in a Gaze-Contingent Window Paradigm.Eyal M. Reingold & Jiye Shen - unknown
Visual–Auditory Events: Cross-Modal Perceptual Priming and Recognition Memory.Anthony J. Greene, Randolph D. Easton & Lisa S. R. LaShell - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (3):425-435.
Reduced Autobiographical Memory Specificity, Avoidance, and Repression.Dirk Hermans, Filip Raes, Carlos Iberico & J. Mark G. Williams - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):522-522.
Perceptual Inference Through Global Lexical Similarity.Brendan T. Johns & Michael N. Jones - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):103-120.
Methods for Measuring Conscious and Automatic Memory: A Brief Review.Dawn M. McBride - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):198-215.
Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns.Alexander Maier, Melanie Wilke, Nikos K. Logothetis & David A. Leopold - 2003 - Current Biology.
The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
43 ( #237,520 of 2,420,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,487 of 2,420,826 )
2009-01-28
Total views
43 ( #237,520 of 2,420,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,487 of 2,420,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads