Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):269-282 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Plagiarism is often equated with theft, but closer inspection reveals plagiarism’s distinctive dimensions. Fundamentally, plagiarism is a form of deception, whereby the plagiarist uses the instructor as a means toward the plagiarist’s own end. Implicitly asking the instructor for a fair and accurate evaluation of the student’s abilities, the plagiarist at the same time sabotages the instructor’s capacity to make that judgment, thereby violating a duty inherent in the student-teacher relationship. Moreover, every act of plagiarism damages the plagiarist’s integrity, thereby subverting his/her own well-being, while contributing as well to a widespread devaluing of education for both the individual and society.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intention Involvement in the Nature of Plagiarism.Hossein Atrak - 2019 - International Journal of Ethics and Society (IJES) 2 (1):1-7.
The Wrongs of Plagiarism.Brook J. Sadler - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):283-291.
The Wrongs of Plagiarism.Brook J. Sadler - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):283-291.
Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism.Naveed Imran - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (4):25-44.
Reassessing Academic Plagiarism.James Stacey Taylor - 2024 - Journal of Academic Ethics 22 (2):211-230.
Plagiarism in research.Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):91-101.


Added to PP

75 (#217,955)

6 months
12 (#312,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references