Rape as an essentially contested concept

Hypatia 16 (2):43-66 (2001)
Abstract
: Because "rape" has such a powerful appraisive meaning, how one defines the term has normative significance. Those who define rape rigidly so as to exclude contemporary feminist understandings are therefore seeking to silence some moral perspectives "by definition." I argue that understanding rape as an essentially contested concept allows the concept sufficient flexibility to permit open moral discourse, while at the same time preserving a core meaning that can frame the discourse
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hyp.2001.0029
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1955 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167 - 198.
Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis.Lois Pineau - 1989 - Law and Philosophy 8 (2):217-243.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Unjust Sex Vs. Rape.Ann J. Cahill - 2016 - Hypatia 31 (4):746-761.
In Defence of Ubuntu.Moeketsi Letseka - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (1):47-60.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

66 ( #80,476 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #113,123 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums