William Talbott's Which Rights Should be Universal? [Book Review]

Human Rights Review 9 (2):181-191 (2008)
Abstract
In this review essay, I first set out and then subject to criticism the main claims advanced by William Talbott in his excellent recent book, “Which Rights Should be Universal?”. Talbott offers a conception of basic universal human rights as the minimally necessary and sufficient conditions to political legitimacy. I argue that his conception is at once too robustly liberal and democratic and too inattentive to key features of the rule of law to play this role. I suggest that John Rawls’s conception of human rights comes closer to hitting the mark Talbott sets for himself and that Talbott incorrectly rejects Rawls’s view. I conclude that what likely divides Talbott and Rawls is that Rawls, but not Talbott, explicitly frames the inquiry into the minimally necessary and sufficient conditions to political legitimacy in terms of a liberal democratic people attempting to determine, as a matter of its just foreign policy, whether or not to recognize other organized polities as independent and self-determining within the international order
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-007-0038-y
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,530
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
May Western Rights, by Extension, Become Human Rights?Antonio Pérez-Estévez - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:61-72.
Human Rights and Human Well-Being.W. J. Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Human Rights and Human Dignity.Schroeder Doris - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Rawls on Human Rights: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Burleigh Wilkins - 2007 - Journal of Ethics 12 (1):105 - 122.
Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights.W. J. Talbott - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):294-297.
Individuals and Relational Beings.P. J. Lomelino - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:87-101.
Human Rights.Clark Butler - 2002 - Philo 5 (1):5-22.
Which Rights Should Be Universal?W. J. Talbott - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
9 ( #494,285 of 2,210,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #357,513 of 2,210,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature