Restrictive versus Permissive Double Effect

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 91:211-223 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The doctrine of double effect can have two different functions, permissive and restrictive. According to the first function, agents are exculpated from the negative consequences of their actions, consequences that would be deemed illicit were they intentionally chosen. According to the second, agents are reminded that they are responsible, albeit in a distinctive manner, for the foreseeable damages that flow from their chosen actions. Aquinas has standardly been credited with a permissive version of DDE. I argue by contrast that the permissive version results from a misreading of Sum. theol. II-II, q. 64, a. 7. Other texts in the same work indicate that he embraced a restrictive version of DDE.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Restrictive versus Permissive Double Effect in advance.Gregory M. Reichberg - forthcoming - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association.
A note on contrast.Roni Katzir - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (4):333-343.
What's So New about the “New” Theory of Photography?Diarmuid Costello - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):439-452.
Revising the Doctrine of Double Effect.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2):201-212.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
Christian and Muslim population and first use of force by States, 1946-2001.Davis Brown - 2014 - The Politics and Religion Journal 8 (2):327-360.
The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
The Principle of Double Effect, Permissiveness, and Intention.Adam D. Bailey - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (3):277-288.
Cognitive meaning and cognitive use.David Rynin - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):109 – 131.


Added to PP

4 (#1,239,535)

6 months
1 (#450,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references