Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):141-141 (1971)

Abstract
This is an intelligently designed collection of essays dealing with a variety of key issues that are in the foreground of reflection on the social and behavioral sciences. The format followed is an ideal one: a key paper, a comment by a critic, and a reply. Thus, for example, Charles Taylor explains and defends teleological explanation of behavior and engages in an exchange with Robert Borger; and Noam Chomsky reviews the problems of explanation in linguistics and is challenged by Max Black. The quality of this volume is quite high and the contributors are leaders in their fields of inquiry. Not only are there explorations by philosophers but also by practicing behavioral scientists. This is therefore an excellent way of gaining an overview of some of the key issues concerning explanation in the behavioral sciences. But the volume is disappointing in breaking new ground. Many of the points and counterpoints made here can be found in other places, and frequently they are explored in greater detail in other places. The collection also reflects an Anglo-Saxon bias for there is little attempt to include any confrontations with the continental concern with the nature of explanation in the social sciences. A detailed bibliography might have helped to direct the reader to further discussion of the issues involved. But despite these limitations, this is an impressive series of confrontations.--R. J. B.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph1971251186
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Do the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Need Each Other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
From Conceptual Representations to Explanatory Relations.Tania Lombrozo - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):218-219.
Against the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences: Confrontations.R. J. B. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):141-141.
Degree-0 Explanation.Roy Harris - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (2):344-345.
Levels of Explanation.Mark Snyderman - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):348-348.
The Rituals of Explanation.Foss Jeffrey - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):618-619.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-22

Total views
7 ( #1,006,510 of 2,411,838 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,838 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes