In Michael Freeman & Ross Harrison (eds.), Law and Philosophy. Oxford University Press (2007)

Authors
Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis
Abstract
Liberalism is today under attack. This attack is being fought along two fronts, and so appears to be coming from different directions, but it is actually coming exclusively from the right. One source is Islamic fundamentalism, and the other is American neo-conservatism, which in turn unites elements of Christian fundamentalism with elements of neo-Platonic political philosophy and neo-Aristotelian moral theory. Both Islamic fundamentalism and American neo-conservatism are perfectionist views, and while perfectionist attacks on liberalism are nothing new, there is a special danger in the position that liberalism currently finds itself. Although bitterly opposed to each other and divided by utterly incompatible substantive views, these two sources of attack share many similarities at a more fundamental level of political theory. The purpose of this paper is accordingly to focus our attention on the similarities between these seemingly opposing perfectionist views, and to defend liberalism against one of the most serious accusations that perfectionists from both camps make against it—the claim that liberalism leads to nihilism.
Keywords perfectionism  nihilism  liberalism  toleration  neutrality  truth  fundamental social unit  security  liberty  rule of law
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Incommensurability and Moral Value.Mark R. Reiff - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (3):237-268.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problems with Rorty’s Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism.Paul D. Forster - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (1):3-45.
Republican Moments in Political Liberalism.Anthony Simon Laden - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237.
The Conservative Challenge to Liberalism.Rutger Claassen - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):465-485.
Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism.Struan Jacobs - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (3):365-375.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
327 ( #26,305 of 2,438,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #28,508 of 2,438,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes