The Death Penalty: For and Against

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution while Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Structure of Death Penalty Arguments.Matt Stichter - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):129-143.
The Morality of the Death Penalty.Qiu Xinglong - 2005 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 36 (3):9-25.
Derrida: Opposing Death Penalties.Marguerite La Caze - 2009 - Derrida Today 2 (2):186-199.
Kant and Capital Punishment Today.Nelson T. Potter - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):267-282.
The Abolition of the Death Penalty in Rwanda.Audrey Boctor - 2009 - Human Rights Review 10 (1):99-118.
The death penalty, in other words, philosophy.Kas Saghafi - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):136-142.
The Death Penalty, Deterrence, and Horribleness.Jeffrey Reiman - 1990 - Social Theory and Practice 16 (2):261-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
473 (#38,780)

6 months
40 (#93,184)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Louis P. Pojman
PhD: Oxford University

Citations of this work

Moral Excuse to the Pacifist's Rescue.Blake Hereth - 2023 - Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence:1-32.
Death and retribution.Claire Finkelstein - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):12-21.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references