The Words of Others

Philosophy 87 (2):281-287 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The great bulk of what we are pleased to deem knowledge comes to us via the words of others. But such knowledge is limited to (mere) information or plain fact.Theoretical, Ethical and Aesthetic discourse are three regions in which, even when we accept the words of others, we transmit content with what I dub prefaces, not flatly, not in our own voice. Explanation of this is suggested: in these regions assertions claim truth without claiming knowledge. So fact-theory and fact-value differ from plain fact for similar reasons, reasons which alleviate the urge to downgrade ethical discourse to the expressive or prescriptive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,737

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Real rules are conscious.Axel Cleeremans & Arnaud Destrebecqz - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):19-20.
Skills of divided attention.Elizabeth Spelke - 1976 - Cognition 4 (3):215-230.
D-words, a-words, and g-words.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Philosophical Studies 16 (1-2):21 - 30.
Function and content words evoke different brain potentials.Robert M. Chapman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):282-284.
The tao of metaphysics.Philipp Keller & Elena Cassetta - 2008 - Swiss Philosophical Preprints.
Names and words in the philosophy of zhuangzi.Guorong Yang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):1-26.
Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon.Michael Glanzberg - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):1-29.
Meaning’s Role in Truth.Charles Travis - 1996 - Mind 105 (419):451-466.


Added to PP

32 (#372,175)

6 months
1 (#481,788)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references