Understanding Autonomy: An Urgent Intervention

Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1 (7) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I argue that the principle of respect for autonomy can serve as the basis for laws that significantly limit conduct, including orders mandating isolation and quarantine. This thesis is fundamentally at odds with an overwhelming consensus in contemporary bioethics that the principle of respect for autonomy, while important in everyday clinical encounters, must be 'curtailed', 'constrained', or 'overridden' by other principles in times of crisis. I contend that bioethicists have embraced an indefensibly 'thin' notion of autonomy that uproots the concept from its foundations in Kantian ethics. According to this thin conception, respect for autonomy, if unconditioned by competing principles (beneficence, justice, non-maleficence) would give competent adults the right to do anything they desired to do so long as they satisfied certain baseline psychological conditions. I argue that the dominant 'principlist' model of bioethical reasoning depends on this thin view of autonomy and show how it deprives us of powerful analytical tools that would help us to think seriously about the foundations of human rights, justice, and law. Then, I offer a brief sketch of a 'thick', historically grounded notion of autonomy and show what we could gain by taking it seriously.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public Health Autonomy: A Critical Reappraisal.Frederick J. Zimmerman - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (6):38-45.
Medical Paternalism – Part 2.Daniel Groll - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (3):194-203.
Beneficence in Research Ethics.David G. Kirchhoffer, C. Favor & C. Cordner - 2019 - In David G. Kirchhoffer & Bernadette Richards (eds.), Beyond Autonomy: Limits and Alternatives to Informed Consent in Research Ethics and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Dialectic of Autonomy and Beneficence in the Standard Argument for ‘Death with Dignity'.Bell Jeremy Raymond - 2016 - Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 6 (1):Article 3.
Cybersecurity in health – disentangling value tensions.Michele Loi, Markus Christen, Nadine Kleine & Karsten Weber - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (2):229-245.
Rights to health care.H. Tristram Englehardt - forthcoming - The Foundations of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Autonomy and Beneficence in an Information Age.Robert M. Sade - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):247-254.
Ebola, quarantine, and the need for a new ethical framework.Corey Benjamin Moore - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 13.
How Autonomy Can Legitimate Beneficial Coercion.Lucie White - 2017 - In Jakov Gather, Tanja Henking, Alexa Nossek & Jochen Vollmann (eds.), Beneficial Coercion in Psychiatry? Foundations and Challenges. Münster: Mentis. pp. 85-99.
Health and autonomy.Jukka Varelius - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):221-230.
Autonomy, Property and Distributive Justice.Malik Douglass Mccluskey - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


Added to PP

216 (#94,357)

6 months
103 (#43,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Reis-Dennis
Rice University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references