Virtue, Rule-Following, and Absolute Prohibitions

Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (1):78-97 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her seminal article ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ (1958) Elizabeth Anscombe argued that we need a new ethics, one that uses virtue terms to generate absolute prohibitions against certain act-types. Leading contemporary virtue ethicists have not taken up Anscombe's challenge in justifying absolute prohibitions and have generally downplayed the role of rule-following in their normative theories. That they have not done so is primarily because contemporary virtue ethicists have focused on what is sufficient for characterizing the deliberation and action of the fully virtuous person, and rule-following is inadequate for this task. In this article, I take up Anscombe's challenge by showing that rule-following is necessary for virtuous agency, and that virtue ethics can justify absolute prohibitions. First, I offer a possibility proof by showing how virtue ethics can generate absolute prohibitions in three ways: by considering actions that directly manifest vice or that cannot be performed virtuously; actions that are prohibited by one's institutional roles and practical identities; and actions that are prohibited by the prescriptions of the wise. I then seek to show why virtue ethicists should incorporate rule-following and absolute prohibitions into their theories. I emphasize the central role that rules have in the development of virtue, then motivate the stronger view that fully virtuous agents follow moral rules by considering the importance of hope, uncertainty about consequences, and taking responsibility for what eventuates. Finally, I provide an account of what Anscombe called a ‘corrupt mind’, explaining how our understanding of virtue is corrupted if we think that virtue may require us to do vicious actions.

Similar books and articles

A virtue-centered account of equity and the rule of law.Lawrence B. Solum - 2007 - In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue jurisprudence. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Prospects of a Viable Biocentric Egalitarianism.Karánn Durland - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):401-416.
An Absolute Principle of Truthmaking.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2013 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):1-31.
The Three Dimensions of Aristotle's Political Ideology.Paul Bullen - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
Benevolence and Absolute Prohibitions.Thomas D. Sullivan & Gary Atkinson - 1985 - International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (3):247-259.
Il gesto assoluto. Duchamp, l’opera d’arte e il linguaggio.Felice Cimatti - 2019 - Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience 13.
Of Gnome and Gnomes.Steven J. Jensen - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):411-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-03

Downloads
792 (#19,903)

6 months
324 (#6,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Reid
San Francisco State University

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Virtue and Reason.John Mcdowell - 1979 - The Monist 62 (3):331-350.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on learning to be good.Myles F. Burnyeat - 1980 - In Amélie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. University of California Press. pp. 69--92.
Virtues and Vices.Philippa Foot - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):117-121.

View all 26 references / Add more references