Fuller and Rouse on the legitimation of scientific knowledge

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fullerand Rouse are both political social epistemologists concerned with the cognitive authority of science, though both disagree on what role it should play in science. Fullerar gues that political factors such as knowledge policy and a constitution play a primary role in the global legitimation of scientific knowledge, while Rouse holds that politics play a role on the local (practices) level but not on the global (metascientific) level of legitimation. While Fullerpr ovides a political response to the legitimation project, Rouse rejects the legitimation project because he holds that it involves the need forglobal legitimation of the place of scientific knowledge in our culture. Key Words: legitimation project • social epistemology • epistemic sovereignty • metascience • scientific knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#198,963)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francis X. Remedios
KU Leuven (PhD)

Citations of this work

Remedios and Fuller on Normativity and Science.Joseph Rouse - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):464-471.
The Unended Quest for Legitimacy in Science.Steve W. Fuller - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):472-478.

Add more citations