Noûs 54 (1):533–253 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Provided that traditional jus ad bellum principles are fulfilled, military humanitarian intervention to stop large scale violations of human rights (such as genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes) is widely regarded as morally permissible. In cases of “supreme humanitarian emergency”, not only are the victims morally permitted to rebel, but other states are also permitted to militarily intervene. Things are different if the human rights violations in question fall short of supreme humanitarian emergency. Because of the importance of respecting political self-determination, in cases of “ordinary oppression”, we normally think that rebellion might be permissible, but not military humanitarian intervention. Thus, according to the received view, the conditions for the permissibility of intervention coincide with the conditions for the permissibility of revolution in cases of supreme humanitarian emergency, but not in cases of ordinary oppression. In cases of ordinary oppression there is an asymmetry between the conditions for the permissibility of revolution and intervention (call this the Asymmetry View). Should we accept the Asymmetry View? I answer this question by outlining an account of political self-determination and by illustrating the complex role that this notion should play in discussing the morality of revolution and intervention.
Keywords Revolution  Humanitarian Intervention  Group Agency  Autonomy  Just War
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/nous.12272
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
The Realm of Rights.Carl Wellman - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):326-329.
Just War and Human Rights.David Luban - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2):160-181.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Helping the Rebels.Massimo Renzo - 2018 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 13 (3).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Helping the Rebels.Massimo Renzo - 2018 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 13 (3).
From Revolution to Regime Change: Consequentialist Barriers to the Transfer of Rights.Ned Dobos - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):199-211.
The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.James Pattison - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):271-277.
Redefining Sovereignty and Intervention.Joelle Tanguy - 2003 - Ethics and International Affairs 17 (1):141-148.
Marx, Lenin and the Problem of Revolution.Vijayalakshmi Rajiva - 1987 - Dissertation, Concordia University (Canada)
Unauthorized Humanitarian Intervention.Mark S. Stein - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (1):14-38.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-07

Total views
111 ( #106,966 of 2,519,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,302 of 2,519,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes