Journal of Military Ethics 6 (1):1-18 (2007)
In prosecuting the war on terror, the Bush Administration asserts that the protections inherent in state sovereignty do not apply to state sponsors of terrorism. I examine three elements of normative arguments to assess the administration's policies. The administration sought to delegitmize terrorism by underscoring the uncivilized nature of terrorist acts. It sought to link the war on terror to efforts to prohibit the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and to frame the invasion of Iraq as central to this war. Finally, the administration proposed new international standards of behavior by arguing that state sponsors of terrorism should be held accountable for terrorist acts planned on their territory, and by seeking to link the protections against intervention inherent in the sovereignty norm to this behavior. Despite initial support for delegitmizing terrorism, the US attempt to frame the war on terror as linked to WMD and Iraq met with skepticism, and it faced fierce competition from alternate frames with regard to Iraq. Finally, the invasion of Iraq stimulated resistance to US policy on normative grounds, with particular concern about the consequences for the sovereignty norm
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
After Sovereignty: On the Question of Political Beginnings.Charles Barbour & George Pavlich (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility.Mark R. Reiff - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):209-242.
Notes on Violence: Walter Benjamin's Relevance for the Study of Terrorism.Verena Erlenbusch - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):167-178.
Closed Borders, Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimation.Arash Abizadeh - 2010 - In David Hollenbach (ed.), Driven From Home: Human Rights and the New Realities of Forced Migration. Georgetown University Press.
State Sovereignty at the Cross-Roads: An Analysis of the Reality and Pretension of its Majesty in International Society.Debiprosad Pal - 1962 - S.C. Sarkar.
State Sponsors of Terrorism Are Entitled to Due Process Too: The Amended Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is Unconstitutional.Keith Sealing - unknown
Justifying Coercive and Non-Coercive Intervention: Strategic and Humanitarian Arguments.Rory J. Conces - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):133-52.
Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism.Timothy Shanahan (ed.) - 2005 - Open Court.
Terrorism Against Non-Innocents: The Ethical Implications.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2010 - In Paul Omoyefa (ed.), Basic Applied Ethics. VDM.
War, Torture and Terrorism: Ethics and War in the 21st Century.David Rodin (ed.) - 2007 - Blackwell.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads11 ( #404,573 of 2,171,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?