The Need for Basic Rights: A Critique of Nozick's Entitlement Theory

SOCRATES 2 (3):18-26 (2014)

Authors
Casey Rentmeester
Bellin College
Abstract
Although the Libertarian Party has gained traction as the third biggest political party in the United States, the philosophical grounding of the party, which is exemplified by Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory is inherently flawed. Libertarianism’s emphasis on a free market leads to gross inequalities since it has no regard for sacred rights other than one’s right to freedom from interference from the government beyond what is essential for societal functioning. I argue that Nozick’s entitlement theory leads to indirect injustice and is therefore an unfitting philosophical theory, which means that the Libertarian Party’s platform is flawed.
Keywords Libertarianism  Robert Nozick
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why "Business's Nastier Friends" Should Not Be Libertarians.Simon A. Hailwood - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (1):77 - 86.
Green Libertarianism.Garvan Walshe - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):955-970.
2004. Nozick's flawless libertarianism?On Nozick - 2005 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 19 (3):103-08.
6 The Entitlement Theory of Justice.Robert Nozick - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader.
The Squirrel and the State.Nicolas Maloberti - 2010 - The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387.
Robert Nozick, Libertarian?P. Boaheng & W. Cooper - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):257-266.
Nozick and Locke: Filling the Space of Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
Libertarianism and Private Property in Land I.Walter Horn - 1984 - American Journal of Economics and Sociology 43 (3):341-356.
Procedural Versus Substantive Justice: Rawls and Nozick.David Lewis Schaefer - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):164-186.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-10

Total views
8,473 ( #84 of 2,237,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,883 ( #96 of 2,237,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature