Authors
Greg Restall
University of Melbourne
Abstract
I sketch an application of a semantically anti-realist understanding of the classical sequent calculus to the topic of mathematics. The result is a semantically anti-realist defence of a kind of mathematical realism. In the paper, I begin the development of the view and compare it to orthodox positions in the philosophy of mathematics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,016
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Logic?Ian Hacking - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (6):285-319.
Multiple Conclusions.Greg Restall - 2005 - In Petr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. College Publications.
Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism.Michael Lockwood - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (128):281-283.
Proofnets for S5: Sequents and Circuits for Modal Logic.Greg Restall - 2007 - In C. Dimitracopoulos, L. Newelski & D. Normann (eds.), Logic Colloquium 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 151-172.
Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism?Greg Restall - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-14

Total views
56 ( #176,432 of 2,403,593 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,240 of 2,403,593 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes