Are Computational Transitions Sensitive to Semantics?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):703-721 (2012)
Abstract
The formal conception of computation (FCC) holds that computational processes are not sensitive to semantic properties. FCC is popular, but it faces well-known difficulties. Accordingly, authors such as Block and Peacocke pursue a ?semantically-laden? alternative, according to which computation can be sensitive to semantics. I argue that computation is insensitive to semantics within a wide range of computational systems, including any system with ?derived? rather than ?original? intentionality. FCC yields the correct verdict for these systems. I conclude that there is only one promising strategy for semantically-laden theorists: identify special computational systems that help generate their own semantic properties, and then show that computation within those systems is semantically-laden. Unfortunately, the few existing discussions that pursue this strategy are problematic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2011.615333
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Causal Relevance of Content to Computation.Michael Rescorla - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):173-208.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Against Structuralist Theories of Computational Implementation.Michael Rescorla - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):681-707.
Computation and Intentional Psychology.Murat Aydede - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (2):365-379.
The Semantic Challenge to Computational Neuroscience.Rick Grush - 2001 - In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 155--172.
Computation, External Factors, and Cognitive Explanations.Amir Horowitz - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (1):65-80.
Computation Without Representation.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):205-241.
A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (4):323-357.
Computation, Connectionism and Modelling the Mind.Mary Litch - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):357-364.
Emdedded Systems Vs. Individualism.Michael Losonsky - 1995 - Minds and Machines 5 (3):357-71.
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION.Gordana Dodig Crnkovic & Mark Burgin (eds.) - forthcoming - World Scientific.
Beyond Turing Equivalence.Aaron Sloman - 1996 - In Peter Millican Andy Clark (ed.), Machines and Thought The Legacy of Alan Turing. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--179.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-06

Total downloads

67 ( #73,703 of 2,051,011 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #55,802 of 2,051,011 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums