A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem

Abstract
The question of how to distinguish between science and non-science, the so-called ‘demarcation problem’, is one of the most high-profile, perennial, and intractable issues in the philosophy of science. It is not merely a philosophical issue, however, since it has a significant bearing on practical policy questions and practical decisions. This essay develops a pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem: it argues that while there are some core principles that we can use in distinguishing between science and non-science, particular judgments and decisions about something's scientific status depend, in part, on practical goals and concerns
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,856
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Naturalists Return.Philip Kitcher - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (1):53-114.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:223 - 234.
Response to the Commentary: Pro Judice.Michael Ruse - 1982 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (41):19-23.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?David B. Resnik - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):329-344.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem.B. D. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
Has Laudan Killed the Demarcation Problem?Kirsten Walsh - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem.Robert L. Morris - 1987 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):241 – 251.
Can We Do Without Pragmatic Encroachment?Brian Weatherson - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):417–443.
Brandom's Demarcation of Logic.John MacFarlane - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (2):55-62.
Popper's Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2016 - In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total downloads
80 ( #74,447 of 2,231,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #147,513 of 2,231,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature