Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40 (1994)
This paper attempts to debunk the slippery-slope argument against human germ-line gene therapy by showing that the downside of the slope – genetic enhancement – need not be as unethical or unjust as some people have supposed. It argues that if genetic enhancement is governed by proper regulations and is accompanied by adequate education, then it need not violate recognized principles of morality or social justice. Keywords: germ-line therapy, slippery slope argument, future generations, social justice CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Germ-Line Gene Therapy and the Clinical Ethos of Medical Genetics.Gregory Fowler, Eric T. Juengst & Burke K. Zimmerman - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (2).
Should We Change the Human Genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Commentary: Maintaining the Somatic/Germ-Line Distinction: Some Ethical Drawbacks.Ray Moseley - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):641-647.
Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations.W. French Anderson - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):275-292.
Human Gene Therapy: Why Draw a Line?W. French Anderson - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):681-693.
Human Gene Therapy and the Slippery Slope Argument.Veikko Launis - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):169-179.
Commentary: How Do We Think About the Ethics of Human Germ-Line Genetic Therapy?Kathleen Nolan - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):613-619.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads68 ( #77,137 of 2,168,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?