Authors
Greg Restall
University of Melbourne
Abstract
Many logics in the relevant family can be given a proof theory in the style of Belnap's display logic Belnap 1982. However, as originally given, the proof theory is essentially more expressive than the logics they seek to model. In this paper, we consider a modi ed proof theory which more closely models relevant logics. In addition, we use this proof theory to provide decidability proofs for a large range of substructural logics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,321
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Proof Theory of Modal Logic.H. Wansing (ed.) - 1996 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Labelled Non-Classical Logics.Luca Viganò - 2000 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Relational Proof System for Relevant Logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Meeting Strength in Substructural Logics.Yde Venema - 1995 - Studia Logica 54 (1):3 - 32.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
38 ( #270,936 of 2,419,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,808 of 2,419,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes