Technical report tr-Arp-11-94

Abstract

Many logics in the relevant family can be given a proof theory in the style of Belnap's display logic Belnap 1982. However, as originally given, the proof theory is essentially more expressive than the logics they seek to model. In this paper, we consider a modi ed proof theory which more closely models relevant logics. In addition, we use this proof theory to provide decidability proofs for a large range of substructural logics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,330

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Proof theory of modal logic.Heinrich Wansing (ed.) - 1996 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Labelled non-classical logics.Luca Viganò€ - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Goal-directed proof theory.Dov M. Gabbay - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic. Edited by Nicola Olivetti.
Meeting strength in substructural logics.Yde Venema - 1995 - Studia Logica 54 (1):3 - 32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#350,816)

6 months
1 (#1,002,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references