Abstract
Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x19003017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Abstract After All? Abstraction Through Inhibition in Children and Adults.Olivier Houde - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):339 - 340.
Aristotle's Understanding of Form and Universals.Hwa Mui - 1989 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University
Abstraction, Covariance, and Representation.Michael Losonsky - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 70 (2):225 - 234.
Abstraction Relations Need Not Be Reflexive.Jonathan Payne - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):137-147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-20

Total views
3 ( #1,317,997 of 2,445,250 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,250 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes