Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting

Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):47 - 64 (2008)
This paper examines voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting as a form of moral discourse. It explores how alternative stakeholder perspectives lead to differing perceptions of the process and content of responsible reporting. We contrast traditional stakeholder theory, which views stakeholders as external parties having a social contract with corporations, with an emerging perspective, which views interaction among corporations and constituents as relational in nature. This moves the stakeholder from an external entity to one that is integral to corporate activity. We explore how these alternative stakeholder perspectives give rise to different normative demands for stakeholder engagement, managerial processes, and communication. We discuss models of CSR reporting and accountability: EMAS, the ISO 14000 series, SA8000, AA1000, the Global Reporting Initiative, and the Copenhagen Charter. We explore how these models relate to the stakeholder philosophies and find that they are largely consistent with the traditional atomistic view but fall far short of the demands for moral engagement prescribed by a relational stakeholder perspective. Adopting a relational view requires stakeholder engagement not only in prescribing reporting requirements, but also in discourse relating to core aspects of the corporation such as mission, values, and management systems. Habermas’ theory of communicative action provides guidelines for engaging stakeholders in this moral discourse.
Keywords stakeholder engagement  stakeholder reporting  relational stakeholder perspective  corporate social responsibility  Theory of Communicative Action  discourse ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9316-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Towards a Transformation of Philosophy.Karl-Otto Apel - 1980 - Marquette University Press.
Theory and Integrity in Business and Society.Donna J. Wood - 2000 - Business and Society 39 (4):359-378.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Social Contract for International Business Ethics.Paul Neiman - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):75-90.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility.Elsa González - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):101 - 108.
Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility.Andrew C. Wicks - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):375-398.
Third Way CR and Third World CR.Loke Min Foo - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:35-53.
Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation.David Hess - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):453-476.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

67 ( #78,277 of 2,168,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #32,532 of 2,168,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums