Searle's misunderstandings of functionalism and strong AI

In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 201--225 (2003)

Authors
Georges Rey
University of Maryland, College Park
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Artificial Intelligence  Functionalism  Searle, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room.Jason Ford - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):57-72.
Searle’s Wall.James Blackmon - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (1):109-117.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Minimal Strong Functionalism.Don Ross - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:237-268.
Searle Freed of Every Flaw.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):161-175.
What’s Really Going On in Searle’s “Chinese Room‘.Georges Rey - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (September):169-85.
Searle on Strong AI.Philip Cam - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):103-8.
Searle's Chinese Room Argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
16 ( #646,952 of 2,454,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes