Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. A Reply to James Williams

Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (1):101-108 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I am grateful that someone whose work I greatly admire could be the philosopher to so eloquently and succinctly cut to the heart of the problem that I posed in the previous issue of Deleuze Studies. James Williams' critical reply leaves me, prima facie, confronted by a stark alternative: either I have misunderstood Deleuze, or I have illustrated problems and lacunae in Deleuze. I will suggest, however, that this is a false alternative, and that Williams' and my divergent accounts of The Logic of Sense – and even Deleuze's oeuvre as a whole – is better understood as a situation of ‘both/and’ rather than ‘either/or’, and hence that my interpretation of Deleuze isn't wrong, but necessarily iconoclastic



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,869

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

296 (#42,439)

6 months
1 (#483,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Reynolds
University of Western Australia

References found in this work

Deleuze’s Other-Structure.Jack Reynolds - 2008 - Symposium 12 (1):67-88.

Add more references