A Solution of Duhem's Problem on the Basis of the Logic of a Crucial Experiment

Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Duhem's thesis holds that there is no logical way to decide the issues between competing theories so that crucial experiments cannot exit. This dissertation shows, contrary to Duhem's thesis, that it is sometimes possible for scientists to perform crucial experiments and that those experiments follow the logic of a crucial experiment. To solve the problem raised by Duhem's thesis, first, this dissertation suggests a robust interpretation that Duhem's thesis consists of four sub-thesis. According to this interpretation, Duhem's thesis is different from Quine's thesis and the underdetermination thesis. The second part deals with nine versions of Duhem's problem found in typical theories such that those cannot be solved within scopes of their theories. With these backgrounds the third part of the dissertation suggests a solution to Duhem problem set up by the robust interpretation. First, two components of the incommensurability thesis, the theory-ladenness of observation and meaning variance, are critically examined by suggesting counter-examples and a distinction between a guiding theory and a target theory and by showing meaning invariance using the dynamic type hierarchy theory. Secondly, a solution to Duhem's problem is suggested by presenting the logic of a crucial experiment, by criticizing Duhem's thesis in terms of the logic of a crucial experiment, and by giving case studies of four historical episodes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,656

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Duhem‐Quine thesis revisited.F. Weinert - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):147 – 156.
Why is 'incommensurability' a problem?Nancy J. Nersessian - 1982 - Acta Biotheoretica 31 (4):205-218.
Error statistics and Duhem's problem.Gregory R. Wheeler - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.
Das Problem der “entscheidenden Experimente”.Walter Kaiser - 1986 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 9 (2):109-125.
On Duhem's and Quine's Theses.Jules Vuillemin - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien Graz 9:69-96.
Una reivindicación de los experimentos cruciales.Alejandro Cassini - 2015 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 40 (1):105-137.
In defense of the Quine-Duhem thesis: A reply to Greenwood.Robert Klee - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):487-491.
The Duhem-Popper-Quine Thesis.Thomas Michael Avery - 1995 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Theory and Experiment in Molecular Population Genetics.Michael Robert Dietrich - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Duhem, Quine and grünbaum on falsification.Gary Wedeking - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (4):375-380.
Experimental psychology and Duhem's problem.Sam S. Rakover - 2003 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33 (1):45–66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references