History of European Ideas 41 (4):440-446 (2015)

SummaryThe paper exposes the views of Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger on the dynamics of the sciences of their day, as both developed them in the two decades after the encounter of the two philosophers in Davos in 1928. It emphasizes points of common concern, and it compares their positions to those of contemporary philosophers of science Gaston Bachelard and Edgar Wind.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01916599.2014.981020
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reflections on Continental Divide: An Author's Response.Peter E. Gordon - 2015 - History of European Ideas 41 (4):454-469.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On The Debate Between Cassirer And Heidegger In Davos. [REVIEW]Anna Musioł - 2013 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 8 (2):171-175.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos.Alick Isaacs - 2013 - Common Knowledge 19 (2):393-394.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,242,912 of 2,326,005 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #658,522 of 2,326,005 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes