Heredity and its entities around 1900

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (3):370-374 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to give an impression of how biologists, at the turn of the twentieth century, came to conceptualize and define the hidden entities presumed to govern the process of hereditary transmission. With that, the stage was set for the emergence of genetics as a biological discipline that came to dominate the life sciences of the twentieth century. The annus mirabilis of 1900, with its triple re-appreciation of Gregor Mendel’s work by the botanists Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich Tschermak, can be seen as the watershed after which theorizing about heredity and experimentation—selecting pure lines and Mendelian crossing—became tightly connected. As to concepts before this, this paper will analyze Carl von Nägeli’s ‘idioplasm’, Hugo de Vries’s ‘pangenes’, and August Weismann’s ‘germ plasm’. Carl Correns’s Anlagen and Wilhelm Johannsen’s ‘genes’ would replace them in the decade after 1900.Keywords: Idioplasm ; Pangenes ; Germ plasm ; Anlagen ; Gene; Genotype

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heredity and its entities around 1900.Author unknown - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment.Robert Olby - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):399-420.
August Weismann on Germ-Plasm Variation.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (3):517-555.
Closing the door on Hugo de Vries' Mendelism.Bert Theunissen - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (3):225-248.
Carl Correns' Experimente mit "Pisum", 1896-1899.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (2):187 - 218.
A Conceptual Ambiguity that Contributed to the Neglect of Mendel's Paper.Iris Sandler & Laurence Sandler - 1985 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7 (1):3 - 70.
The Germ Plasm: a Theory of Heredity.A. Weismann - 1893 - Philosophical Review 2:373.
Heredity/Development in the United States, circa 1900.Jane Maienschein - 1987 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9 (1):79 - 93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why genes are like lemons.F. Boem, E. Ratti, M. Andreoletti & G. Boniolo - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57 (June):88-95.
Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail.Charles H. Pence - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):177-190.
Thomas Hunt Morgan and the invisible gene: the right tool for the job.Giulia Frezza & Mauro Capocci - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):31.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations