Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468 (2002)

Abstract
This paper reports data and scholarly opinion that support the perception of systemic flaws in the management of scientific professions and the research enterprise; explores the responsibility that professional status places on the scientific professions, and elaborates the concept of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Data are presented on research misconduct, availability of research guidelines, and perceived research quality.
Keywords responsible conduct of research (RCR)  research guidelines  scientific professions  systemic flaws
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concept of Risk and Responsible Conduct of Research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
67 ( #171,191 of 2,506,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes