Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research

Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reports data and scholarly opinion that support the perception of systemic flaws in the management of scientific professions and the research enterprise; explores the responsibility that professional status places on the scientific professions, and elaborates the concept of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Data are presented on research misconduct, availability of research guidelines, and perceived research quality.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Data selection and responsible conduct: Was Millikan a fraud? [REVIEW]Richard C. Jennings - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):639-653.
Group mentoring to Foster the responsible conduct of research.Caroline Whitebeck - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):541-558.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
Four observations about “six domains of research ethics”.Edward J. Hackett - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.Kenneth D. Pimple - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students.Lindsay G. Feldman, Adam L. Fried & Celia B. Fisher - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (6):496-518.
The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW]Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#213,869)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references