American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):7 – 28 (2005)
Contemporary research ethics policies started with reflection on the atrocities perpetrated upoconcentration camp inmates by Nazi doctors. Apparently, as a consequence of that experience, the policies that now guide human subject research focus on the protection of human subjects by making informed consent the centerpiece of regulatory attention. I take the choice of context for policy design, the initial prioritization of informed consent, and several associated conceptual missteps, to have set research ethics off in the wrong direction. The aim of this paper is to sort out these confusions and their implications and to offer instead a straightforward framework for considering the ethical conduct of human subject research. In the course of this discussion I clarify different senses of autonomy that have been confounded and present more intelligible justifications for informed consent. I also take issue with several of the now accepted dogmas that govern research ethics. These include: the primacy of informed consent, the protection of the vulnerable, the substitution of beneficence for research's social purpose, and the introduction of an untenable distinction between innovation and research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy.Bernard Williams - 2002 - Princeton: New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28-36.
In Defense of the Duty to Participate in Biomedical Research.Rosamond Rhodes - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):37 – 38.
Does Research Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Common Good, Reasonable Risk and Social Justice.Alex John London - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):37 – 39.
Does Research Ethics Rest on a Mistake?Franklin G. Miller - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):34 – 36.
De MinimisRisk: A Proposal for a New Category of Research Risk.Rosamond Rhodes, Jody Azzouni, Stefan Bernard Baumrin, Keith Benkov, Martin J. Blaser, Barbara Brenner, Joseph W. Dauben, William J. Earle, Lily Frank, Nada Gligorov, Joseph Goldfarb, Kurt Hirschhorn, Rochelle Hirschhorn, Ian Holzman, Debbie Indyk & Ethylin Wang Jabs - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):1-7.
Similar books and articles
Emergency Research Without Consent Under Polish Law.Joanna Różyńska & Marek Czarkowski - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):337-350.
Are Research Participants Truly Informed? Readability of Informed Consent Forms Used in Research.James R. P. Ogloff & Randy K. Otto - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):239 – 252.
Informed Consent, Exploitation and Whether It is Possible to Conduct Human Subjects Research Without Either One.Dave Wendler - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.
Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens.Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Informed Consent.Janet L. Brody, John P. Cluck & Alfredo S. Aragon - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):285 – 298.
Procedural Misconceptions and Informed Consent: Insights From Empirical Research on the Clinical Trials Industry.Jill A. Fisher - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):251-268.
Research Without Consent: Exception From and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Informed Consent for Research in Borderline Personality Disorder.Rachel E. Dew - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-4.
The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #101,820 of 2,146,892 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,910 of 2,146,892 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.